Why automation projects fail (and the simple framework to follow for success)
|
We had a call last week with a potential client who wanted to build an AI system that would automatically find prospects on LinkedIn, craft personalized messages, send connection requests, and follow up with a 7-touch sequence. “I saw this guru do it and make $50K in a month,” he said. When we asked what manual processes were eating up his time right now, he paused. “Well… I spend about 6 hours a week copying data between systems. And probably another 4 hours sending the same onboarding emails to new clients. Oh, and I manually create invoices for every project.” “So you want to automate something you've never done before,” I said, “but you’re not automating the 10 hours of manual work you’re already doing every week?” Silence. This is exactly why 90% of automation projects fail. The 3 Types of Automation (And Why Order Matters) After building 100+ automations, I’ve learned there are only 3 types of automation projects you can pursue. Most people start with the wrong one. Type 1: Automate What You’re Already Doing Manually
Type 2: Automate Proven Strategies by Others
Type 3: Experimental Automations
Let me break down why this order matters… Type 1: The No-Brainer Automations These are the tasks you’re already doing manually that eat up your time every single week. Examples:
Why these win:
One client was manually creating project briefs in Google Docs, then copying information to their project management tool, then creating a Slack channel, then sending a welcome email. 45 minutes per new project. We automated the entire flow. Now it takes 2 minutes. At 8 projects per month, that’s 6 hours back in their schedule. Type 2: Copy What’s Working for Others Once you’ve automated your manual processes, then you can look at proven strategies from other businesses. Examples:
Why these work:
The key is finding strategies that are working in businesses similar to yours. Don’t copy a B2C ecommerce funnel if you’re running a B2B consulting business. Type 3: Experimental Automations These are the “shiny object” automations that everyone wants to start with. Examples:
Why these usually fail:
Here’s the thing - experimental automations can work. But only after you’ve built a foundation with Types 1 and 2. Why Most People Get This Backwards Type 3 automations are sexy. Type 1 automations are boring. They’re just making your current life easier. But here’s what happens when you start with Type 3: The automation doesn’t generate the results you expected (because the strategy was unproven). You blame the automation. Meanwhile, you’re still spending 10+ hours per week on manual tasks that could be automated with 90% certainty of success. The Smart Approach
By the time you get to experimental automations, you’ll have:
The Simple Test Before building any automation, ask yourself: “Am I currently doing this manually, or am I hoping this will work?” If it’s the latter, wait. Build the manual stuff first. Your future self will thank you. Talk soon, Mitch P.S. What manual processes are eating up your time right now? Hit reply and let me know. I might feature the most common ones in a future email (anonymously, of course). Learn more about MakeBigMoves partner offers here: Partner Program | Whitelabel EOI. |